Prometheus News


As Aadhaar amendment Bill lapses,

Jan 28, 2020 by William Lewis.

Aadhaar has been the subject of numerous disputes and has been subject to lengthy hearings in the Supreme Court over the legality of the unique identity scheme. We may have seen another point in this story last week if the central government were able to pass its Aadhaar and other legislation bills, 2018, which would amend the Aadhaar Act 2016 as well as preventing money laundering. Changes to the Act and the Telegraph Act Now that the Lok Sabha is to be dissolved for the general election, pending a bill, it will be abolished. This interval provides an opportunity to examine the Indian state's vision and its impact on more broadly digital identity projects and the rights of citizens. Designing a digital identity It is imperative that the digital identity system, especially in collaboration with state resources and legal powers, was initially designed around the principles of governance, data protection and privacy and cybersecurity. A significant body of evidence about the implementation of Aadhaar has raised doubts as to whether a central national digital identity program can help deliver social services more effectively by reducing leakage and corruption. Extermination errors, which in many cases have led to restrictions on hunger and social protection, are well-documented, but the government is unwilling to admit the problem, leaving an effective solution. It is now clear that a badly designed digital identity system will cause more harm than good. And cannot be fixed or improved by periodic patches. Silicon Valley's first approach to "launch and attraction" is not a viable model for national identity projects. Our national policy approach to Aadhaar is strong. On the one hand, the unique identification authority of India, the legal entity that administers the deposit of both, is the only solution to complaints related to this unique identity. Nevertheless, many hats are worn by anyone wearing any effort to ensure his independence. The firm implements the Aadhaar project, organizes various players within the Aadhaar ecosystem and is believed to protect the rights of Indians. India does not have a comprehensive data protection framework despite the central government's promise to the Supreme Court. It requested the public's opinion on the draft Data Protection Bill presented by the Justice BN Sri Krishna Committee but ultimately failed to present it in Parliament. A patch of simple fixes The amendments to the Aadhaar Act came into force after the Supreme Court's decision on the legality of the identity project. In a September ruling, official access to Aadhaar data was prevented by withdrawing "need and proportion". It restricts the use of Aadhaar to verify identity, stating that only the state can use it - when required by law and under additional legal standards - and not private agencies. In fact, under the law of contract, the use of bribes by private players was found to be unconstitutional and a violation of the right to privacy. In opposition to this, Justice DY Chandrachud argued for the Aadhar project that it is currently unconstitutional. The amendment bill, if approved, would have refused to have the Supreme Court adopt some essential principles of privacy and data security for the Aadhaar project. This allows anyone to use augmented authentication under the provisions of "any law", or for any purpose specified by the central government, or if they meet unspecified standards of privacy and security. Allows It also sought to amend the Telegraph Act and the Money Laundering Prevention Act to allow telecom companies and banks to provide seamless authentication to their customers. The central government appears irrelevant to the bill against the Supreme Court's decision to impose such blankets on Aadhaar and prevent its use by private players for infringement of Indian citizens' basic rights. The government did not even bother to submit a bill for public consultation and review. Here's the annoying consistency: The Aadhaar Act was pushed through Parliament without any legislative advice or parliamentary committee review, though it was requested by several members. Likewise, many remote regulations issued under the Aadhaar Act have never been made available for review. Instead, the government has implemented them directly by notifying them in the Gazette of India.